is

/ɪz/·verb·before 700 CE·Established

Origin

From PIE *h1esti — nearly identical in Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, and German across 6,000 years.‌​‍​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍​‌​‌​‍​‌​‌​‍​‌​‍​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍

Definition

Third person singular present of 'be'; used to indicate identity, existence, or a quality.‌​‍​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍​‌​‌​‍​‌​‌​‍​‌​‍​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍

Did you know?

PIE *h₁ésti → Sanskrit 'ásti' → Greek 'estí' → Latin 'est' → German 'ist' → English 'is.' Six thousand years, six languages, and the word has barely changed. 'Is' may be the most stable word in any human language — the sound you make to say 'exists' has been nearly identical since the Bronze Age.

Etymology

Proto-Indo-Europeanbefore 700 CEwell-attested

From Old English is (third person singular present of bēon, to be), from Proto-Germanic *isti (is), from the PIE root *h₁es- (to be, to exist). This root is the most fundamental verb in Indo-European and one of the most extensively studied in historical linguistics. From *h₁es- came Latin esse (to be — hence English essence, essential, absent, present, entity, interest), Latin est (he/she is), Greek esti (is), Greek einai (to be — hence English ontology), Sanskrit ásti (is), Old Persian astiy (is — as in the Behistun inscription), Lithuanian esti (is), Old Church Slavonic jestŭ (is), Hittite ēšzi (is — the oldest attested form, c. 1600 BCE), and Armenian ē (is). The English verb to be is famously suppletive — built from three distinct PIE roots: *h₁es- (is, are), *bʰuH- (be, become — hence English be, been, German bin), and *h₁er-/*wes- (was, were). This suppletive pattern is preserved across Germanic: German ist/bin/war, Dutch is/ben/was. The conjugation of to be is irregular in virtually every Indo-European language precisely because it is so ancient and frequently used that it resisted regularisation by analogy. Key roots: *h₁es- (Proto-Indo-European: "to be, to exist").

Ancient Roots

This Word in Other Languages

ist(German)est(Latin)estí (ἐστί)(Greek)ásti(Sanskrit)ēšzi(Hittite)

Is traces back to Proto-Indo-European *h₁es-, meaning "to be, to exist". Across languages it shares form or sense with German ist, Latin est, Greek estí (ἐστί) and Sanskrit ásti among others, evidence of a shared etymological family.

Connections

See also

is on Merriam-Webstermerriam-webster.com
is on Wiktionaryen.wiktionary.org
Proto-Indo-European rootsproto-indo-european.org

Background

Origins

The word 'is' — the third-person singular present tense of 'to be' — may be the most ancient essentially unchanged word in the English language.‌​‍​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍​‌​‌​‍​‌​‌​‍​‌​‍​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‍​‍​‌​‍​‍ It descends from Old English 'is,' from Proto-Germanic *isti, from PIE *h₁ésti, the third-person singular form of the verb *h₁es- (to be, to exist).

The stability of this word across the Indo-European family is remarkable. PIE *h₁ésti is reflected as Sanskrit 'ásti' (is), Greek 'estí' (ἐστί, is), Latin 'est' (is), Old Church Slavonic 'jestŭ' (is), Lithuanian 'ẽsti' (is), Hittite 'ēšzi' (is), and German 'ist' (is). In each case, the word is phonologically close to the reconstructed PIE form — a degree of stability across six millennia and dozens of languages that is almost unparalleled in historical linguistics. The reason is that 'is' is the most frequently used verb form in these languages, and high-frequency words resist change because every generation of speakers hears and produces them thousands of times.

Proto-Indo-European Roots

The PIE root *h₁es- (to be) is the source of an enormous family of English words beyond the forms of 'be' itself. Through Latin 'esse' (to be), it produced 'essence' (the being of a thing), 'essential' (pertaining to being), 'absent' (being away — ab + esse), 'present' (being before — prae + esse), 'interest' (being between — inter + esse, originally a legal term for damages 'between' parties), and 'entity' (a being, from Late Latin 'entitās').

The English verb 'to be' is famously irregular — 'am, is, are, was, were, be, been, being' — and this irregularity reflects the fact that the modern paradigm is actually three separate PIE verbs fused together. 'Am/is' comes from PIE *h₁es- (to be). 'Be/been' comes from PIE *bʰuH- (to grow, to become). 'Was/were' comes from PIE *h₂wes- (to dwell, to stay). English speakers unknowingly conjugate three ancient verbs every time they use 'to be,' switching between them without any awareness that 'I am,' 'I was,' and 'I will be' are etymologically unrelated forms pressed into service as a single paradigm.

Keep Exploring

Share